TETELESTAI Notification List

The TETELESTAI (It is finished) email which will contain the first 800#'s will be posted first on a private page and will be sent out to everyone subscribed to the private page's feed.

If you wish to subscribe to the private page's feed, please visit the TETELESTAI page located HERE and access the private page.

If you're having trouble please give me an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

(Note: The TETELESTAI post is the official "Go" for redemption/exchange.)

Guest Posting & Responding Now Available

Dinar Chronicles is now allowing viewers to guest post and respond to articles. If you wish to respond or speak your mind and write a post/article or about the current situation relating to Iraq, the RV, the GCR and so on. You may now send in an entry.

All you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com with these following rules.

The subject line of your email should be: "Entry | (Title of your post) | Dinar Chronicles"

- Proper grammar
- Solely write intel, rumors, news, thoughts, messages regarding Dinarland, Iraq, the RV, the GCR, NESARA/GESARA, the Republic, Spirituality, Ascension and anything that is relating
- Your signature/name/username at the end (If you wish to remain anonymous then you don't need to provide one.)

If you have any questions or wish to communicate with us then please give us an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

Send your entry and speak out today!

Dinar Chronicles Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the site's daily newsletter.

Featured Post

Operation Disclosure: GCR/RV Intel Alert for February 19, 2019

RV/INTELLIGENCE ALERT - February 19, 2019 (Disclaimer: The following is an overview of the current situation based on intelligence leak...

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

The Cost of Trump's Trade Wars So Far is $1.25 Trillion

$1.25 Trillion - That's The Cost Of Trump's Trade Wars So Far: Kolanovic

by Tyler Durden
Wed, 06/06/2018 - 12:35

Three months ago, in the aftermath of the February VIXplosion and when the shape of Trump's protectionist agenda was only just starting to take shape, JPM's head quant, Marko Kolanovic made a simple prediction: despite all his posturing, Trump would never dare to pursue an aggressive trade war that destabilizes markets for one simple reason - if stocks crash, it would make a Democratic victory more likely in the midterms, which in turn raises the threat of Trump getting impeached.

The JPM quant also laid out the various possible outcomes between trade war and Fed policy error in terms of a game theoretical "prisoners' dilemma" matrix, as follows:

A significant trade war started by this administration would destabilize global equity markets. Should this happen ahead of the November election, it would impair the administration’s ‘market scorecard’ and likely lead to an election loss. Lost elections open a path to impeachment, and other complications. The game is also non-zero sum, as one can both use tough rhetoric and at the same time do little disruptive action (e.g., players as we defined them can ‘have their cake and eat it’). Setting up a diagram (similar to the well-known ‘prisoners’ dilemma’) points clearly that there will be strong rhetoric, but weak or no action that would destabilize equities.

One could argue that a similar analysis can be applied to the risk of the Fed committing policy errors (see figure below, asymmetry in the case of the Fed would be causing a recession, and the public pinning the blame to specific individual central bankers responsible for the decision).

Needless to say, back then Kolanovic was especially bullish, as he has been for much of the past year. And, for those who follow his musing, his bullishness has persisted until now - largely as a result of his views on investor positioning, which the quant believes is not bullish enough ever since the February flush which saw an outsized liquidation by many marginal market players - and which in light of the market action appears to have been accurate.

Fast forward to today when Kolanovic is out with a new note, in which he takes another look at the impact of Trump's trade wars, now that they have had a chance to develop and mature, and his latest assessment appears far less optimistic than it was before, to wit:

In 2016, we argued that the probability of Trump winning the presidency was higher than the consensus and that it would likely be positive for equities. This double out-of-consensus view materialized as the new administration enacted pro-market policies such as tax reform. However, since this March, the impact of trade and protectionist policies became a significant market headwind. It is a broad consensus across academia, business leaders and market practitioners that trade wars and protectionism are a lose-lose economic proposition.

But most notable is that Kolanovic's original skepticism that Trump would never dare to roil the markets tremors appears to have faded, if not evaporated, and has been replaced with a big question mark, as not even Kolanovic can pretend he knows what Trump may say or do next. His epiphany is below:

Earlier in March we argued that the current administration cannot afford a disruptive trade war that would destabilize equity markets in an election year. While we still think this is true, trade tensions continue to inflict damage to investor psychology and business confidence. A negotiation strategy that includes bluffing/threats can be successful in a two-party negotiation setup, but is more likely to deliver self-defeating results in a complex system such as global trade (e.g., think of supply chain disruptions, the uncertainty it introduces in long-term planning, etc.).

More interesting is what Kolanovic does next, which is to put the cost-benefit or rather cost-cost analysis of Trump's growing protectionist agenda in the context of the market moves over the past three months, or as he puts it, "we have attempted to quantify how the market value was impacted by trade war policies since March." He explains how, and what the number is below:

By attributing the trade-related news flow (positive or negative) to the performance of the US market, we estimated the impact on US equities to be negative 4.5% (with a margin of error of +/-1%, Figure 1). Taking the current market capitalization, this translates into $1.25T of value destruction for US companies.

The number is notable because it is well over half, or nearly 2/3 of the value of Trump's entire fiscal stimulus which has so far been the crowning achievement of the Trump administration. What is perplexing to Kolanovic is why Trump would threaten to undo the fiscal stimulus by pursuing a populist agenda which has, in his view, little benefit to either the economy or to markets.

But more to the point, after being convinced that Trump would never engage in the kind of bi- and multilateral trade feuds as he has, the JPM strategist now concedes that Trump's trade wars could in fact have an adverse impact on markets, especially if the trade wars persist.

The value destroyed by a trade war might be reversible if policies are reversed, while the positive impact of fiscal measures is likely to remain. This would likely catalyze a ~4% market rally. However, if this uncertainty hangs over the market for a more extended period of time, the damage becomes more permanent and the probability of a disruptive tail event increases.

And there you have the investment case of Trump's trade war: a favorable outcome would lead to a modest, 4% rally; meanwhile, a full blown, "nuclear" trade war and there is no bottom in sight. While the Upside/Downside does not strike us as particularly attractive, especially when the basis of the assessment is the assumption of Trump's rationality, the bigger risk is that Trump himself may never have appreciated what Kolanovic said back in March, namely that a full blown trade war carries legitimate risks to Trump's presidency. If indeed so, as Trump is increasingly eager to make his point, then the increasingly likely outcome is that one proposed by Goldman over the weekend, namely that for Trump to win his trade wars, the market has to crash.

Source: Zero Hedge



We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

All rights reserved go to their respective holders. We do not own the intellectual property shown on this website, the respective holders own that privilege unless stated otherwise.

We do not endorse any opinions expressed on the Dinar Chronicles website. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on Dinar Chronicles.

Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to any reader of the website. This website is...Read More