TETELESTAI Notification List

The TETELESTAI (It is finished) email which will contain the first 800#'s will be posted first on a private page and will be sent out to everyone subscribed to the private page's feed.

If you wish to subscribe to the private page's feed, please visit the TETELESTAI page located HERE and access the private page.

If you're having trouble please give me an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

(Note: The TETELESTAI post is the official "Go" for redemption/exchange.)

Guest Posting & Responding Now Available

Dinar Chronicles is now allowing viewers to guest post and respond to articles. If you wish to respond or speak your mind and write a post/article or about the current situation relating to Iraq, the RV, the GCR and so on. You may now send in an entry.

All you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com with these following rules.

The subject line of your email should be: "Entry | (Title of your post) | Dinar Chronicles"

- Proper grammar
- Solely write intel, rumors, news, thoughts, messages regarding Dinarland, Iraq, the RV, the GCR, NESARA/GESARA, the Republic, Spirituality, Ascension and anything that is relating
- Your signature/name/username at the end (If you wish to remain anonymous then you don't need to provide one.)

If you have any questions or wish to communicate with us then please give us an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

Send your entry and speak out today!

Follow Dinar Chronicles by Email

Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Sept. 22, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Sept. 22, 2018 Compiled 22 Sept. 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Abuse...

Thursday, June 7, 2018

"Taking a Straight Line to Deal with a Problem?" by Inquisitive - 6.7.18

Entry Submitted by Inquisitive at 12:39 AM EDT on June 7, 2018

For any who many not be aware, please take note and consider, the McCarran-Walter Act Of 1952 as an appropriate authority on matters relevant to nationality and immigration.

I found it interesting to note that this Act has been a law for approximately 66 years and, in my opinion, still makes a lot of sense in today’s multi-cultural environment, and for good reason.

Historic facts seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people elected to represent “us” in Washington do not have a clue about relevant laws already in existence.

As we know, after several terrorist incidents were carried out in the United States and other places around the world, an apparent ever-present risk in western societies, Donald Trump was severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit, or at least temporarily suspend, the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities and even people of certain religions

The criticisms raised were quick to condemn such an initiative as, among other things, being un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and racist. Particularly, Democrat Representatives and Senators, backed by the Mainstream media, swore that they would never allow such action or legislation. However, the President responded to protesing voices by saying that such a prohibition on immigration was constitutional. In fact, the selective immigration ban is already enshrined in law and has been applied on several occasions in the pass by Presidents of the day.

The actual name of the legislation is the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. It allows for the "suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the president, whenever the president finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."

"The president may, by proclamation and for such a period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose any restrictions on the entry of aliens he may deem to be appropriate."

Somewhat ironically, the president when this Act was passed was Democrat Harry Truman, and the last president to use it was another Democrat, Jimmy Carter. The latter was in 1979 when it was used to keep Iranians out of the United States. Actually, Carter made ALL Iranian students already in the United States to check in with the government and then he deported a bunch of them. By number, seven thousand were found to be in violation of their visas and a total of 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the USA in 1979. Interesting, is it not?

The McCarran-Walter Act also requires that an "applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and in agreement with the principles of our Constitution." [Emphasis added.]

The obvious comments to add here, in today’s context, are:

a) The convenience of putting aside any history that does not fit with today’s (hidden) cabal agenda that seemingly permeates, if not dominates, the minds and actions of those who are amongst the Democrat members of Congress;

b) The adherence to the standard discord of chosen words used to set the tone for all Americans to adopt, without their having to stop and think for themselves. It is easy to just parrot words, such as: un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous and, the priceless king-hit word of the day, “racist”, to really stir up emotions, real or perceived, particularly by those funded by Soros to stir up public unrest.

c) Now, if I stop to think, wasn’t it the Democrats, and like-minded people, who protested on behalf of MS13 gang members that they, too, were human beings first and foremost, despite their apparent absence of decent morals and “good character”? What was the stated criteria in the legislation I pointed out? Hmmm…not so sure they fit?

d) As I understand, doesn’t the Quran forbid Muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution? If so, technically, shouldn’t ALL Muslims be refused immigration? Don’t Muslims also hold Sharia Law above all other laws of the country? If so, are they not potentially a future risk, by stealth at least, to seek court-approved exemptions to laws that don’t fit with their practices? Is this “racist” or simply good sensible reasons for the provisions enshrined in legislation to be applied without FEAR or FAVOR?

e) To put the shoe on the other foot, if an American went to a Muslim nation, would the courts of that nation willing set aside Sharia Law to accommodate Americans before their courts? If an American were to immigrate to such a nation, wouldn’t it be expected that new immigrants would need to respect, and accord with, the laws of their new country of choice?

f) What constitutes sedition?

Just thought I would ask the question?

Inquisitive

Authenticate at: http://library.uwb.edu/Static/USimmigration/1952_immigration _and_nationality_act.html

Reactions:

Disclamer:

We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

All rights reserved go to their respective holders. We do not own the intellectual property shown on this website, the respective holders own that privilege unless stated otherwise.

We do not endorse any opinions expressed on the Dinar Chronicles website. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on Dinar Chronicles.

Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to any reader of the website. This website is...Read More