TETELESTAI Notification List

The TETELESTAI (It is finished) email which will contain the first 800#'s will be posted first on a private page and will be sent out to everyone subscribed to the private page's feed.

If you wish to subscribe to the private page's feed, please visit the TETELESTAI page located HERE and access the private page.

If you're having trouble please give me an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

(Note: The TETELESTAI post is the official "Go" for redemption/exchange.)

Guest Posting & Responding Now Available

Dinar Chronicles is now allowing viewers to guest post and respond to articles. If you wish to respond or speak your mind and write a post/article or about the current situation relating to Iraq, the RV, the GCR and so on. You may now send in an entry.

All you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com with these following rules.

The subject line of your email should be: "Entry | (Title of your post) | Dinar Chronicles"

- Proper grammar
- Solely write intel, rumors, news, thoughts, messages regarding Dinarland, Iraq, the RV, the GCR, NESARA/GESARA, the Republic, Spirituality, Ascension and anything that is relating
- Your signature/name/username at the end (If you wish to remain anonymous then you don't need to provide one.)

If you have any questions or wish to communicate with us then please give us an email at UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com

Send your entry and speak out today!

Follow Dinar Chronicles by Email

Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of July 21, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of July 21, 2018 Compiled 21 July 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Abuse R...

Saturday, July 22, 2017

Wells Fargo Unintentionally Releases Trove of Data on Wealthy Clients

Wells Fargo Accidentally Releases Trove of Data on Wealthy Clients

JULY 21, 2017

Gary Sinderbrand received information about clients of Wells Fargo that he had not sought. | Credit: Jessica Kourkounis for The New York Times

When a lawyer for Gary Sinderbrand, a former Wells Fargo employee, subpoenaed the bank as part of a defamation lawsuit against a bank employee, he and Mr. Sinderbrand expected to receive a selection of emails and documents related to the case.

But what landed in Mr. Sinderbrand’s hands on July 8 went far beyond what his lawyer had asked for: Wells Fargo had turned over — by accident, according to the bank’s lawyer — a vast trove of confidential information about tens of thousands of the bank’s wealthiest clients.

The 1.4 gigabytes of files that Wells Fargo’s lawyer sent included copious spreadsheets with customers’ names and Social Security numbers, paired with financial details like the size of their investment portfolios and the fees the bank charged them. Most are customers of Wells Fargo Advisors, the arm of the bank that caters to high-net-worth investors.

By Mr. Sinderbrand’s estimate, he has financial information for at least 50,000 individual customers. In all, Mr. Sinderbrand said, these clients have tens of billions of dollars invested through Wells Fargo, all laid out in vivid detail for him as part of the discovery process in his lawsuit.

The files were handed over to Mr. Sinderbrand with no protective orders and no written confidentiality agreement in place between his lawyers and Wells Fargo’s. While the documents were not filed in court, it would be perfectly legal for Mr. Sinderbrand and his lawyer to release most of the material or include it in their legal filings, which would then become part of the public record.

The documents were sent by Angela A. Turiano, a lawyer with Bressler, Amery & Ross, an outside law firm in Florham Park, N.J., hired by Wells Fargo, which is not a party to the suit. Mr. Sinderbrand and one of his lawyers, Aaron Zeisler, notified Ms. Turiano on Thursday morning about the sensitive documents now in their hands.

In an email response, Ms. Turiano described the disclosure as “inadvertent,” and wrote, “Obviously this was done in error and we would request that you return the CD asap so that it can be properly redacted.”

Mr. Zeisler said his client intended to keep the CD secure and confidential. “We are continuing to evaluate his legal rights and responsibilities,” Mr. Zeisler said. “Wells Fargo has not identified what specific documents it asserts were inadvertently exposed.”

The disclosure is a data breach that potentially violates a bevy of state and federal consumer data privacy laws that limit the release of personally identifiable customer information to outside parties.

State and federal regulations also require companies to notify customers when their information has been improperly released, as Wells Fargo may now do. And some of the accounts in Mr. Sinderbrand’s database are listed as having a foreign owner, which would potentially trigger a separate set of overseas regulations, such as Europe’s stricter privacy statutes.

“There are thousands of documents in here that the public should never see,” Mr. Sinderbrand said, noting that a less scrupulous recipient of such data could have easily posted it online.

Reached on Friday, a day after Ms. Turiano was made aware of the issue, a spokeswoman for Wells Fargo Advisors, Emily Acquisto, released the following statement: “Wells Fargo takes the security and privacy of our customers’ information seriously. We are investigating this matter and will take the proper steps based on the outcome of our investigation.”

Ms. Turiano and a spokeswoman for her firm did not respond to requests for comment.

The New York Times was shown large portions of the data and confirmed that it included what appeared to be clients’ names, unredacted Taxpayer Identification Numbers, assets under management, portfolio performance, mortgage information and details on 529 education savings plans.

One file, for example, contained details on the holdings of a well-known hedge fund billionaire who had at least $23 million invested through Wells Fargo Advisors.

The files also include extensive information on Wells Fargo’s financial advisers employed by the bank, their performance, their compensation and their client lists. One typical record showed the full roster of one adviser’s client book and his commissions for the past year, totaling $1.5 million.

Based on the fairly narrow subpoena that his lawyer submitted — it sought communications about Mr. Sinderbrand’s employment and compensation — there was no reason for the bank to turn over such information, especially without any redactions, Mr. Sinderbrand said.

“This is a public policy issue,” he said. “They have to find out what happened and how it happened. Did it happen before, and could it happen again?”

Mr. Sinderbrand, 61, has an acrimonious history with Wells Fargo. He worked at the bank as a financial adviser until 2013, when he said he resigned to work for a health technology start-up. In 2016, he reached a settlement with the bank to resolve lingering financial issues related to his compensation. He later sued the bank, saying it violated a confidentiality clause in that agreement. That case is pending in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

The documents that Wells Fargo gave to Mr. Sinderbrand’s lawyer were sent in response to a subpoena in a separate defamation lawsuit proceeding in New Jersey against one of his brothers, who works at the bank.

The disclosure of so much sensitive material comes amid heightened concern about the ease with which personal information can be hacked, leaked or accidentally divulged. Banks are supposed to have extensive internal controls to protect clients’ data.

Wells Fargo’s internal controls are under particular scrutiny after a false-accounts scandal came to light last year. The company disclosed that its employees, trying to meet aggressive sales goals, opened as many as 3.5 million unwanted bank and credit card accounts for customers without their knowledge, and agreed this month to pay $142 million to settle a related class-action suit.

In terms of information security, litigation poses a special risk because confidential material often must change hands. The legal industry’s best practices for handling digital documents in discovery — “e-discovery,” as lawyers call it — include careful reviews to exclude or redact personally identifiable information, encryption and other safeguards as data is transferred.

Confidential information is also often covered by a protective order, which must be granted by a judge, to prevent the data’s recipients from sharing it more widely. None of that seemed to have happened here, reflecting a breakdown in vetting at multiple levels.

In Ms. Turiano’s email to Mr. Sinderbrand’s lawyer, she wrote: “We went through a long process of a very large email review with an outside vendor with instructions on exclusion which was spot checked. Clearly there was some type of vendor error — which I am confirming now.”

Source: NY Times



We are in compliance with, "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."

All rights reserved go to their respective holders. We do not own the intellectual property shown on this website, the respective holders own that privilege unless stated otherwise.

We do not endorse any opinions expressed on the Dinar Chronicles website. We do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content or communications posted on Dinar Chronicles.

Dinar Chronicles is not a registered investment adviser, broker dealer, banker or currency dealer and as such, no information on the website should be construed as investment advice. We do not intend to and are not providing financial, legal, tax, political or any other advice to any reader of the website. This website is...Read More