Entry Submitted by Ruby at 6:14 AM EDT on April 30, 2017
I’ve been watching the back and forth for a bit now. It’s crazy. I totally understand the concern the banks are going to do something BAD, but I would think there would be recourse for that: we’ll report them to OWKs. If Grandfather owns the bank (HSBC), then he’ll be able to smack them for trying to undermine humanity in some way.
Besides, let’s look at this with some sense. We only have to sign the NDAs for the sovereign rates, correct? Ok, so any of the non-sovereign rate receivers can collect their Zim abundance and STILL talk about it. They may protect the sovereign rate, but not the locations of the exchanges, which won’t be necessary for long anyway. So there must be other reasons for it.
Supposedly, laws have been changed governing the banking industry, but we still have rights, no matter what their lawyers know or do. So this is my intention. I plan to walk in to my exchange and discuss the point of the NDA. I will write their explanation for the purpose of the NDA on the bottom of the page below the signature line. I will write on the original (in blue ink) what my understanding of their explanation is (such as, “It was explained that the purpose of this NDA is to keep confidential the rate and the location of this exchange.”) and then have them initial it and I will as well. When I sign the document, I will add below my signature line “UCC 1-308 All Rights Reserved”
Fisher was on the Real Truth Call Friday night, explaining the UCC 1-308 code. It can be used for a wide variety of things. It’s part of contract law. I’m hoping we’re about to enter a world where this sort of thing will never be necessary again.
Hopefully, this is it, folks.
Ruby
