"Very, Very Interesting" - Guest Post by An Observer
To: "An Observer":
You are correct to observe that the post of WH Ken today had no named reference - . It was, however, briefly following my post earlier today. Additionally, you "clearly" did not observe his last post referencing this same US Code section and making a similar threat which was, essentially, a response to me at that time. Your "very, very interesting" observation wouldn't have felt like such a epiphany had you had knowledge of the prior exchange.
I am a frequent reader and an occasional poster to IDC. I find it sometimes both interesting and infuriating. What is accepted as "intel" is often appalling. I speak truth to the absurdity and some (WH Ken, for one) have sought to discourage ANY contrary voice. It's "cabal". It's "disinformation". They're "fearful and hateful". They're "trying to get you to get rid of your currency". When I post, my detractors do EVERYTHING EXCEPT meet my logic, or rationally and factually (made up "facts" don't count) refute what I have said.
So, when I read the "wink and nod" of your post suggesting, perhaps, I "knew he spoke of me" is a myopic view of the words in front of you. Look up the prior posts. See what I say. And think of what you read (here or anywhere) without regard for the author. You will need to make no assumptions or leaps of logic with me. I think most everyone has their "thing". For me, it's that I hate lying and will, generally, speak to it when I see it. I don't need to be angry, hateful, or name-calling. It isn't useful and it isn;t my style - read my posts. But, I do speak to the lies, directly and boldly.
Perhaps, you may find the foregoing interesting, as well, though I doubt "very, very" interesting.