"Timing - Politics - GCR" - Guest Post by One Who Believes
How many excuses are we going to tolerate for the inaction we are constantly seeing. I'm sure we are all struggling with our "discernment" abilities. And surely we are not able to act in and of our own, so we constantly are trying to take the high road and find any way possible to keep our faith with little or no concrete proof that any of this is going to really happen or is even valid. There is simply way too much dis-info being passed around; the agents are way too good at what they do for us to know truth. Where is the evidence? Prove something, anything, to me that what you surmise is true. Logic is a wonderful aphrodisiac when what you truly desire is constantly found wanting, but It wears thin when used time after time, after time, to excuse the inaction we see running rampant in these changes that we suppose will happen, even despite glaring evidence to the opposite. How do we know these "facts" on which we use such wonderful logic are even true? Think about poor ZAP. How many times can a person be wrong before it is just silly.
It looks and can be fairly easily demonstrated that Hillary is continuing to mask all her corruptions, has clearly subverted the main stream media, and has so much help in covering her tracks that she will gain the White House. I do not like the choice of Donald at all. General Dunford, or Paul Ryan, or Al Gore are spoken of with a reverence that is out of proportion to anything they have actually admitted to or can be proven by anyone else.
I am very tired of "un-named" sources, supposed "un-identified" intelligence leaks, and "insiders" who claim to have it on "good authority", that claim to know things out of the ether.
While I would love to deem that 800 numbers are coming, that a GCR is even likely, or a "new Republic"; "restored republic", or any form of reasonable non-corrupt governance is possible, however, there is a huge absence of substance to these rumors. You have a classic game of telephone going on. One person says something, then it gets repeated and goes on and on as if these are all new sources. They don't appear to be.
I know this site only "works" if it has something to report, but why don't we start admitting that unless you "reporters" of constant good news, that does never happen, have something that has substantiation, it does not make the muster of being reported on. We could all use some reality blended in with our news. We can't get it from the MSM, so how about treating us with the respect to prove what we conjecture before it is posted here..... huh?