Entry Submitted Anonymously at 9:11 PM EDT on September 6, 2016
The poster is correct that there need to be many questions asked. At this link a video guest makes the point that all posted inputs need to be interpreted with some degree of discernment, applying logic, to try to distill truth from many posts that may be unreliable or deceptive: http://usawatchdog.com/pre-collapse-more-dangerous-than-actual-collapse-warren-pollock/
At HiddenSecretsOfMoney.com Mike Maloney makes the continual point that all fiat currencies go to zero. At RoadToRoota.com the point is made that perhaps when the world turns to gold-backed currencies it will not be parceled out to currency holders but instead according to one's lifelong productivity, such as using the Social Security contributions.
Historically, a certain number of persons are bought off in a revolution by offering free land and/or debt forgiveness. Here we also see debt forgiveness as an incentive to accept/support the revolution. Average credit card debt is hard to measure but may be $5000 per person: http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/average-credit_card_debt-1276.php
The only check on how much of new "real" currency is distributed to the population is, one supposes, will they riot and revolt? One supposes if one's bank account is drained they will presume a robbery. This one factor more than anything is the factor encouraging the belief that currency holders will receive the new currency in some proportion to their fiat currency holdings.
Remember, it does not matter how much "gold-backed" currency is distributed, it does not change the amount of gold backing it, which is the real value...thus, more currency-paper, less value per each note.
On the encouraging side, the world appears to be opting for a society in which there is a finite amount of money (gold) therefore it will be visible if the currency is diverted to unauthorized (e.g., no House appropriations bill) means. On the discouraging side, the option the US has to engaging in the World economy, other than participating peacefully in this gold-backed currency arrangement, is to go to war. The chance of the war option succeeding is probably similar to that identified by the WOPR computer in "War Games": none.
On the discouraging side, once a new government is acknowledged, the new government will be asked questions about "what happened." If those questions are not answered truthfully or are only partly answered there will be dissatisfaction with the new government, since a republic, to exist, must be honest; it must do the people's will, not decide things for itself, especially for its own elite interest. It simply will not work to try to blame a few. However, some kind of amnesty policy will be needed. If amnesty can be offered to the Cabal it certainly can be offered to those the Cabal manipulated, e.g., to report false information.
So, the answer to your questions is, apply discernment. Think! Just because someone has published a process, does that mean the rule of law now exists to enforce it? Think!
In my view, offsite exchanges are risky, very risky, one needs first to see honesty and candor before trusting.
To ask another question:
If the price of gold has not changed, how likely is it that "Tier One, Two, and Three" have been exchanged? Would they not take their new cash and buy gold? After all, Jim Willie expects the new currency to be devalued, perhaps 30% twice, cutting the value in half. So are large-scale currency holders ignorant of this? Would they NOT wish the safety of gold? Unlikely. It is more reasonable to think, the RV is NOT in progress, not AT ALL, until the price of gold changes.