It is curious, but more sad, to note from WSOMN chat yesterday, that AdminBill elected to ban "scotchie" for simply expressing an opinion which, in part, contradicted that of AdminBill. Scotchie even said it was just his opinion (just as AdminBill's words had been earlier in the same chat) and on what he had based it. In unsurprising irony, today AdminBill charges his WSOMN members to do exactly that which scotchie said he had done to form his opinion - do independent research and "piece things together", presumably, to form an opinion about what all the available information means.
Is it possible that AdminBill absorbed some of the approach of scotchie for which AdminBill banned him? Too late for scotchie.